Faith healing couple faces hefty medical bill

August 30, 2011

Timothy and Rebecca Wyland wound up serving time for first-degree criminal mistreatment after failing to promptly treat their daughter’s weird eye condition. She had a growth above her left that that, left untreated, would have led to blindness.

When she was taken into protective custody, she received expensive treatments, paid by Oregon taxpayers through the Oregon Health Plan.

The Wylands are members of the Followers of Christ, an Oregon City church that practices faith healing and rejects doctors.

Their attorneys question some of the medical charges brought by the state, including vaccinations that were not approved by her parents. These vaccinations were not relevant to Alayna’s condition.

I say just dock the cost of the vaccinations from the $26,000 that might wind up being owed by the family if the restitution hearing leans that way.

Actually, I predict that this means the parents will be encouraged to sue the hospital and state now. Heaven forbid the evil doctors should get away with preventing future health issues while they dealt with her immediate health issues. Scandalous behaviour! It must not be tolerated! Only prayer can truly keep children safe from measles, whooping cough, and all the other nasty demons masquerading as viruses and germs!

I’m glad the kid got real help and I’m sure deep down she’s grateful that people stepped in to save her sight. Deeper down, maybe her parents will be, too. That faith healing crap is so ridiculous and does more harm to children than doctors do.


Why follow a god that permits abuse?

August 18, 2011

Oh right, so abusers can justify spanking their children to death. Kevin and Elizabeth Shatz spanked Lidia 7 hours (with a few prayer breaks in between) and it resulted in severe tissue damage causing death.

That site offers part 1 of the CNN broadcast of the case and quotes the end:

Kevin Schatz has pleaded guilty to torture and murder, and will spend the next 22 years in prison. His wife Elizabeth will serve at least 12. At their court hearing, Lydia’s 11-year-old sister Zakiah asked her parents, “Why did you adopt her? To kill her?”

The Shatz were influenced by the cruel teachings of a couple known far and wide as promoters of violence against children as a way to obey God utterly: Michael and Debi Pearl. They’re co-authors of numerous books, one of which was found in the Shatz’ possession, To Train Up a Child. In their books, and on that video, they insist that “sparing the rod” doesn’t just mean spoiling the child, but hating the child. Real love is to hit them with anything that will make a great slapping noise against their skin, like a spatula. The Shatz chose sturdy plumbing pipes. Those worked really well.

It’s sickening. Truly sickening. How anyone can get so wrapped up in that bloody book and think it’s giving the world an acceptable way to live… This is unacceptable. Anyone who supports the Pearls and their horrific version of child-rearing should wake the hell up and see just what kind of monsters they’ve become. Situations like this are reasons why I can get behind the notion of capital punishment sometimes. I suspect each Shatz will wind up spending the majority of their prison time in solitary. There are some lines even die-hard criminals would never dream of crossing.


Jesus declared guilty of assault

August 9, 2011

From the Chronicle Herald:

A Halifax man who thinks he’s Jesus and tried to use the Bible to defend himself on charges of assaulting his wife and child was found guilty on nine charges Monday in Halifax provincial court.

“Freedom of religion does not trump obligations to comply with the criminal law. This is so obvious that it goes without saying,” Judge Anne Derrick said in convicting Dalton Cornelius Jones of five counts of assault and single charges of uttering threats, assault with a weapon, resisting arrest and failing to appear in court

Except it did have to be said, and will probably always have to be said to remind people that what they think their religion allows isn’t always going to mesh with what the laws of our societies deem as appropriate treatment of human beings. So what if bible quotes can “prove” beating one’s wife and child is okay in the eyes of God? It’s sure as hell not okay in the eyes of the Canadian court 2000 some years later.

He replied that he was still going to represent himself, and said he didn’t refer to himself as Jesus during his closing arguments because Derrick didn’t want him to.

“May I say something impertinent? If Jesus Christ was here I would be recommending that he have a lawyer,” the judge replied.

His day for sentencing is September 23rd.


Last week I saw a play called The Progressive Polygamists

August 8, 2011

It was a very hilarious satire that came to Saskatoon for the Fringe. Those in Vancouver should check it out in September. Emmelia Gordon and Pippa Mackie play sister-wives Eden-Grace and Mercy Eve who explain to their audiences how terrific it is to have such a close relationship with another woman (somewhat) willing to be married to the same old man, the prophet of Plentiful. They do this with songs and audience participation and a skipping rope — oh, a little loss of innocence there.. never will think about jump ropes the same again…

As terrific as the bonds of sister-wives might be, the realities of life in a Mormon polygamist commune have been in the news lately and Warren Jeffs, the polygamist leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, was just convicted of sexual assault against minors.

Jeffs, who had 78 wives in addition to his legal spouse, 24 of whom were under the age of 17, was convicted of the rape of two young followers, aged 12 and 14. The girls had grown up at Jeffs’ Yearning for Zion ranch, according to authorities. The AP reports that as a prophet of his polygamist sect — which has more than 10,000 members nationwide — Jeffs “documented everything he did, keeping track of every marriage he performed, every young woman he wed, even recording his intimate moments.” Many of those records were seized in a 2008 raid on a ranch his church operates near Eldorado, Texas, according to CNN. Items seized included “a 20-minute audiotape that began and ended with a man saying a prayer” that prosecutors alleged was the recording “of Jeffs’ sexual assault of a then-12-year-old girl in the presence of three other ‘wives.’” Ultimately, these records were used to secure the conviction. The jury deliberation lasted 3 1/2 hours.

Sentencing started on Friday, with a worst case scenario of 119 years in jail when adding up all counts, and reportedly read out a statement that morning declaring the world would see a “whirlwind of judgment” if he, God’s “humble servant,” wasn’t set free. Then he boycotted proceedings, opting to remain in another room while his future was decided for him. I expect his future will consist of nothing but a room from now on.


While I admit it’s a deterrent…

February 13, 2011

Don’t handcuff your children to desks and make them read the bible. The handcuffs are punishment enough.

A mother in Berrien Springs, Michigan tried that after her 16 year old son got arrested for shoplifting.

As punishment, his mother confined him to a 6-foot by 4-foot room with only a Bible and told him to think about what he’d done.

Roughly two weeks ago, when the teen’s mother found out he’d somehow gotten an MP3 player, he was then handcuffed to a chair in his room from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Meals were brought to him. At bedtime, the teen was handcuffed to a desk leg.

The mother provided the teen with bottled water and a bell to ring if he needed to go to the bathroom. He was only allowed outside to shovel snow.

The teen told police he was supposed to be spending several months in his room, but “couldn’t take it anymore” and devised a way to call 911.

The case is being investigated. The boy and his nine year old sister have been moved to foster care for the time being.


What happens when religion really does lead to child abuse

October 27, 2010

Sorry, “alleged.” Even so, this story is sad and disturbing.

A judge Thursday continued a trial against a Paradise couple for the alleged murder and torture of their adopted child, so attorneys can read the more than 6,000 pages of evidence, with more coming.

Butte County Superior Court Judge Kristen Lucena vacated the November trial date and set it for Feb. 28 in the case against Elizabeth Schatz, 43, and her husband, Kevin, 47.

The pair allegedly caused the death of their 7-year-old adopted daughter and serious injuries to her 11-year-old sister during separate “biblical chastisements” with a whip-like instrument in February at the family home.

The husband’s attorney, Michael Harvey, joined in the motion to continue.

Deputy district attorney Kelly Maloy, sitting in for District Attorney Mike Ramsey, who is prosecuting the case, said they had no objection.

The Schatzes are charged with murder, torture involving great bodily injury and misdemeanor child abuse involving one of their six biological children.

Why did their 7 year old adopted daughter from Africa wind up dead? She mispronounced a word so they whipped her hard enough to cause severe muscle tissue damage. The couple has apparently been taking their child rearing lessons from some Tennessee fundamentalist’s book, the title of which is not included in the article. The book supports

the use of a quarter-inch rubberized or plastic “plumber supply line” to “train” children to be more obedient to their parents and God.

It looks related to another case in 2006 out of North Carolina, where an adopted four year old died from similar injuries and his 9 year old brother sustained some but lived. That article mentions a book by Michael and Debi Pearl. Salon did a rundown of the couple and their book “To Train Up a Child” not long after (breaks added for easier reading).

As the Pearls, their advocates, and supporters of similar Christian parenting approaches appear to see it, child “training” serves, in part, as a bulwark against “modern,” liberal, secular, permissive, “child-centered” parenting — the touchy-feely stuff of timeouts that, they suggest, spoils children into believing in a boundary-free world that revolves around them.

“Pearl and others in their camp associate permissive parenting and the assumed moral laxity that it produces with non-biblical, humanist or naive understandings of human nature. It’s ‘us,’ the true believers, against ‘them,’ the secularists and anyone else who has fallen under their influence,” says Mark Justad, senior lecturer in religion and society and executive director of the Center for the Study of Religion and Culture at Vanderbilt University.

“It’s all part of the larger picture of returning our whole culture to godliness.” Or at least preserving godliness in one’s own family, safe from the “crusade” launched by “spanking abolitionists,” safe from the influence of the corrupt, and corrupting, secular world.

The Pearls consider this method of “training” as a means of showing how much parents love their kids.

“Training” children to obey unconditionally is much more than training them, say, not to bother Mommy. It is training them to submit to the will of God. “When the child is young, the parents are the only ‘god’ he knows. As he awakens to Divine realities, it is through his earthly father that he understands his heavenly Father,” Pearl writes in the book. “As the child relates to the figurehead of authority (his parents), in like manner he will later be prone to relate to God. If, when the parents say, ‘No,’ they do not mean ‘No,’ then the ‘thou shalt not’ of God will not be taken seriously either.”

Salon includes a story of parents who claim this method worked with their daughter.

“We’re only treating our child the way God would treat us,” adds Lauren’s husband, Joel, 26, a banker. “As in Hebrews 12, He chastens those whom he loves. If I love my child, I am going to train her. Others don’t have to believe that, but I do.”

Yes, but precisely where in the Bible do we find mention of quarter-inch plumbing supply lines? First, it should be noted that the oft-quoted expression “Spare the rod, spoil the child,” frequently assumed to appear in the Bible, actually appears in Samuel Butler’s 17th century satiric poem “Hudibras.”

Rods get more than a few mentions in the bible otherwise, though, and get quoted and will get interpreted in much the same way, whether that’s precisely what the original writers intended or not.

The North Carolina mother is in jail so I think it’s likely the Schatz’s will wind up getting the same treatment. Here’s hoping, anyway.

I wonder what kind of rationalizing the Pearls do. I’m sure they’d say this couple did it wrong if it didn’t work for them.. in much the same manner as any self-help sham artist would. I doubt they’ll ever feel a lick of guilt over their book and the problems it’s created.


Why wouldn’t a priest care that he’d drowned a baby?

July 28, 2010

This is one of the saddest stories I’ve come across lately. A lot of atheist bloggers have picked up on it already, but there’s no reason why I can’t express my own horror and regrets over it.

It happened in Moldova. The Sun (UK) has blurred the priest and baby right out of the picture, but it looks as if the actual video of the event is up on Youtube for reasons that I hope are all about raising awareness of the dangers of religion and the very young.

The baby’s dad Dumitru Gaidau, 36, said: “We all saw it, the priest didn’t put his hand over the baby’s mouth to stop water going in as he should have done and as they do at every other baptism.

“We couldn’t believe it that he just put his hand over his belly and over the head and submerged him three times in the water.”

The baby’s godmother Aliona Vacarciuc, 32, said: “The baby was crying as he went into the water.

“We couldn’t believe it but we thought the priest must know what he’s doing, but he didn’t. When we got him back there was nothing that could be done anymore.”

She said that she and the other godparents had challenged the priest and asked him: “What have you done.”

I wonder if he was thinking, “I guess I better finish this baptism so this child can go to heaven…”

He could get up to three years for manslaughter.

Doesn’t seem like enough, does it?


I missed Morality movie night. How Despicable of me

July 27, 2010

So, in apology, I offer a feminist take on Despicable Me, which is likely better than I would have written in terms of that movie which I did see this past weekend. If you haven’t seen it yet, read this anyway. This is less about “spoilers” but more about something that might slip past your eyes and mind as you watch the film, and you shouldn’t go to the film without knowing it’s something to look for and wonder about.

The film itself is fairly simplistic. Gru is the “despicable” villain of the piece, looking for a way to remain on top of the evil villain pyramid .. only someone’s gone and stole some – a new rival going by the name of Vector. Gru decides he can only top this by stealing the moon, but first he has to steal back the shrink ray that Vector stole right from under him. In order to accomplish this, he “adopts” three girls who’ve been selling cookies for their lackluster orphanage (this is what I and the Hathor site will target on in a moment) because they can get into Vector’s place and he cannot (the girls don’t do the stealing; they deliver robotic cookies to do the deed). By the end of the film, of course, Gru’s desires for infamy have been overtaken by reminders of how disappointing his mother was in terms of encouraging him as a boy, and the positive impact these three girls have had on his life. From the Hathor site:

My problem is with the role of the three little girls, Margot, Edith and Agnes. Gru’s and Vector’s and Dr. Nefario’s [Gru's tech guru accomplice] and the bank’s villiany is acknowledged and expressed. While we’re shown the horrible conditions the girls live under, that is never acknowledged, not even by them. They’re abused, yet it’s played for laughs-given that this is a children’s movie (?isit?) that’s expected, but it has slid over into tasteless territory. Stealing a pyramid? Funny. Putting little girls in boxes in imitation of POW torture? Not funny at all.

That’s in there, seriously. There’s reference to a girl who didn’t make her cookie quota and they say hi to this boxed up girl on their way out of the evil orphanage owner’s office at one point. When they wind up back at the orphanage, they’re also tucked into boxes for a while. It’s not played as a big deal; it’s played like a dull time-out for bad behaviour.

I haven’t read them, but there was a series of books that started with A Child Called “It” by Dave Pelzer, who claimed he’d been abused like an unwanted animal in his own home while the rest of the kids in the family lived lives as ordinary as any others. Other family members have come forward since to say he lied about how bad it was, but the book still sold well, as have the rest of them about how he adapted and became a worthwhile member of society in spite of his abused childhood.

As to caging up kids, how many examples do you want of this actually going on?

There was the couple in Norwalk, Ohio who claimed it was “for their protection.” Their adopted special needs kids spent nights locked up in wooden safety boxes so they wouldn’t endanger each other and set fires. Two of the kids have since sued the couple and the caseworkers who put them in that home. The couple is in jail now. I don’t know about the caseworkers, but even after the first trouble came out about the first eight kids, somehow the couple was allowed three more.

There’s Etelvina Rodriguez, whose twins spent a lot of time in cages. They were technically feral by the time their plight was discovered in 2003. They were placed with another couple who were determined to help those boys learn .. well, everything about being human and loved. The Viniegra family eventually adopted them outright.

There was also an allegation in 2003 in Queensland, Australia regarding disabled children kept in cages by staff at private care facilities.

There was bad shit going on in orphanages across Romania. JK Rowling made it something of a mission to raise awareness of that atrocity several years ago and yet I’m only learning of it today.

And how about the Facebook Group “Children, like animals, should be kept in cages.” It’s a “Just for Fun” group with only 13 idiots for members, thankfully.

There’s a story out of Malaysia and a girl kept in an iron cage behind a house in a wealthy neighbourhood. Neighbours eventually alerted authorities about that one.

And in case it looks like Canada is blessedly immune to this stuff, alas, I must burst a bubble. The original Canoe article is gone, but Arstechnica copied the whole of it in 2001.

BLACKSTOCK, Ont. (CP) — This sleepy Ontario farming town was in shock Friday after two residents were charged in what police call one of the worst cases of child abuse in recent memory.

“People are dumbfounded,” said Mike Carlson, who works at a local gas station in the town of 4,600 about 40 kilometres north of Oshawa.

A 49-year-old man and his 40-year-old wife surrendered to police Thursday amid allegations that they kept their two teenaged sons caged in baby cribs wrapped with wire mesh and forced them to wear diapers.

For fear of identifying the youths, the names of their parents were not disclosed.

A police news release alleged the children were shockingly mistreated.

“The youngsters were forced to wear diapers, remained in their cribs for hours, suffered physical punishment and did not receive adequate food,” the release said.

Keeping the children locked in cribs allegedly went on “on a daily basis for years,” police said.

Few people in town seemed to know much about the family, which has lived in a rented farmhouse on the outskirts of town for about two years.

Now let’s get back to Despicable Me and the despicable lack of give-a-damn toward these orphanage scenes. Aside from a “but he saved those girls from it!” auto-response, keep in mind there were other girls (we saw one in a box, recall) still stuck living there under a tyrant who’d torture them in the very same way as these stories demonstrate. Those scenes are treated as barely of interest, except as a minor plot device when Gru discovers Dr. Nefario called that tyrant and had the girls returned to that little slice of hell. They were distracting Gru away from his true purpose, after all, so good riddance.

Back to the Hathor site.

The girls are sad when they’re booted back to the orphanage with the abusive head of the orphanage–but never express too much anger about it. Nor does Miss Hattie ever get HER punishment, and there’s not any thought about the other orphans in her orphanage, as some sort of wrap up in the plot. Gru rescues the girls from Vector-but not the orphanage and evil-but-”nice” Miss Hattie. Notice that the rescue is from HIS adversary, but not theirs?

True enough. And while he does wind up adopting them, that’s still a sticking point. The despicable orphanage is allowed to remain problematic yet ignored by everyone, including us movie goers who’ve been lured into insane laughter over the other events in the film and Gru’s very adorable crew of minions who are responsible for many of them.

If you do decide to see this film, take your brain with you. Think about what’s in this movie besides a few sight gags and stylish art design. Is it really something you should let kids watch without comment? Is it okay that a happy ending only happens to some, but not all?


When religions, marriage, and kids don’t mix

February 18, 2010

I found an article from Chicago about a divorce case going on. The wife is Jewish, the husband converted to Judaism once they had a kid but is back to being Catholic full time, and their three year old daughter is caught in the middle.

The big problem right now is the fact that Dad took her to a Catholic service, apparently going against a 30 day restraining order that allows him to spend time with the child but doesn’t allow him to expose her to his faith. That all started after Dad sent Mom pictures of the girl’s baptism ceremony back in December. He claims that he sent the pictures to show off how pretty and happy the girl looked and Mom reacted in the worst way possible.

From the article:

Reyes, who is Catholic, acknowledges he took their daughter Ela to Holy Name Cathedral on Jan. 17 — accompanied by a local television news crew — and that’s what landed him in trouble most recently.

“This is, in her mind, more about control,” Reyes said of his estranged wife on Tuesday between court hearings.

At issue is a disputed agreement that the one-time couple would raise the girl in the Jewish faith, attorneys in the case say.

While Joseph Reyes said he converted to Judaism after his daughter was born, he insists they never agreed to raise the girl in the Jewish faith, that they never kept a kosher home, rarely observed the Sabbath and only went to services a few times together with the child.

I guess Mom figures it’s time to rectify that? She’s not quoted at all in the piece so we don’t get to see her rationalize this. And Dad bringing cameras along to the church was a great idea. The most important thing a kid needs during a big divorce is media attention. He’s now in contempt of court over it.

After having a child, Joseph Reyes says, he converted to Judaism, but only because he felt pressured by his wife’s family, he said.

He felt torn during the marriage about whether to introduce the toddler to his religion or wait for her to discover it on her own.

He’s also quoted as saying, “I encourage Ela to see different perspectives.”

It’s a pity his wife doesn’t agree with that. There’s no information in the piece about whether they talked about this prior to having kids, or even once the child was born. Was he just working on some assumption that she’d let the kid experience both belief systems? He claims he felt pressured to switch faiths by her family – didn’t that raise a red flag? And what exactly led to the divorce? This article is all about how he’s reacting to the court order.

ABC News has more about this and CBS reports that:

Rebecca Reyes says it’s her estranged husband who made the mistake when he had their daughter baptized. In her petition, she argues that if he’s allowed to raise the child in any faith other than Judaism, he will cause their daughter irreparable harm.

“I wouldn’t harm my daughter simply to somehow spite my soon (soon)to-be ex-wife,” Joseph Reyes said. “That’s silly and ridiculous.”

The Chicago Tribune is reporting the wife’s side of this and more about the ongoing divorce proceedings. It also includes a quotes from Emily Buss, a law professor at the University of Chicago, who called the Jewish-Only restraining order “striking”:

“The idea is we change religious views — that is what religious freedom includes,” Buss said. “Even if (one) parent has more authority in the form of more custody, the other parent can (usually) … still expose the child to his or her religion even if it was not the religious practices within the family when it was intact.”

Also, the kid is three and the divorce shit’s been going on since 2008. You’d think the messed up family split up would be far more detrimental to the child’s emotional well being than what building she’s in for a few hours on a weekend. This couple has far bigger problems than which version of god gets worshiped.


161 million Euros divided by ? over ? years equals what exactly?

November 26, 2009

It sounds like Christian Brothers is offering a hefty apologetic sum to victims of child abuse in Ireland. But does it make up for years of pain, heartache, and fighting for justice? Probably not.

The Brothers said that €34 million in cash would be used to help victims of abuse, whose plight was identified in a government report in May. However, the move was criticised, with one victims’ group describing it as “mere smoke and mirrors”.

The Ryan report chronicled cases of tens of thousands of children who suffered systematic sexual, physical and mental abuse over decades at residential homes run by 18 congregations. It concluded that the Brothers order was responsible for most of the cases.

€127 million worth of property is part of that deal, too, but I don’t know what that includes, or how much good that does. Along with money, the Brothers are releasing an interim report regarding legal cases brought against them on behalf of victims.

Its publication was delayed by several years after a lengthy legal battle waged by the Brothers to withhold the names of all its members, dead or alive. An agreement was eventually struck in 2004, allowing the Brothers’ institutions to be identified.

More than a thousand witnesses testified to abuse in 216 schools and residential settings between 1914 and 2000. More than 800 individuals were identified as physical or sexual abusers — an extraordinary number compared with the handful of prosecutions and convictions. Ninety per cent of witnesses reported physical abuse while half reported sexual abuse.

“Acute and chronic contact and non-contact sexual abuse was reported, including vaginal and anal rape, molestation and voyeurism in both isolated cases and on a regular basis over long periods of time,” the report said.

The commission found that the worst offender was the Brothers’ order, which ran most of the institutions for older boys, while the another Catholic order, the Sisters of Mercy, which was supposed to care for girls, also came in for heavy criticism.

The Magdalene Sisters was based on girls from one of those schools. That’s one of the saddest movies I’ve ever watched.

Well anyway, it’s a start. Apologies are a place to start. It’s not enough, but it’s a start.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 118 other followers