Hemant Mehta at Friendly Atheist linked to this article to poke some fun at the poor writing, as well as the poor arguments. I’ll pick out a couple other pieces:
From all the evidence I’ve seen, read and have heard from talking with atheists, many of them are not even interested in knowing the truth.
This is because we’ve all heard the arguments before and can discount them all as unprovable and unlikely. Your “truth” is a state of mind that suits where you are in life. Atheists are somewhere else, seeking verifiable truths about people, the world, and the universe at large. In some points we’ll find we are in agreement with religious points of view. In others we won’t be.
Given a method for them to honestly seek and find the truth about Christ Jesus the atheists I have encountered could care less and mock and scoff at it.
This is a common boo boo. You mean we couldn’t care less. If we could care less, we would try. Many of us do seek the truth of Christ and find the bible lacks a lot in the way of verifiable fact and history. The whole Christmas miracle thing has bundles of holes, as does the whole resurrection section. Hey, that rhymes! We are not content to pick a gospel at random and believe it without question. Nor will we believe anyone else who believes without question.
To me, their mocking and scoffing seems proof enough to me of their refusal to believe that God exists thus they deny, that God exists and that they freely choose to not even find out the truth for themselves.

I think a comma has been sacrificed for the greater stupidity here. I freely admit that I don’t think any gods exist and I don’t think there is any “fact” that could be tossed my way that would prove otherwise, no matter how true it may seem to the believer.
Many of the atheists I’ve encountered could care less if God truly exists or not because these atheists are only interested in not having any rules to follow and they have focused their attention solely on themselves in their own desires.
How many atheists has this person encountered? I’m getting the feeling that it will never matter how many people we don’t kill, how many laws we don’t break, how many children we don’t molest, how many dollars we raise for charity or how many churches we don’t burn down. People like this will still insist we must be anarchists. I’ll pull a few pieces from the American Atheists Aims and Principles page now.
American Atheists, Inc., is organized
* to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals, and practices;
* to collect and disseminate information, data, and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough understanding of them, their origins, and their histories;
* to encourage the development and public acceptance of a humane ethical system stressing the mutual sympathy, understanding, and interdependence of all people and the corresponding responsibility of each individual in relation to society;
* to develop and propagate a social philosophy in which humankind is central and must itself be the source of strength, progress, and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and aims at establishing a life-style and ethical outlook verifiable by experience and scientific method, independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Not every atheist knows about this group, nor would every atheist want to join it. It’s great to see it exists, though. Many of us agree with these principles and promote them in our own way already, either with blogs, or by joining other groups with similar goals in mind.
They in their denial are overlooking the fact that their main focus in lacking a belief in gods is opening them up to a huge problem in that their primary repudiation is focused against Christ Jesus. Yes, they say that they lack belief in any gods yet to their denial is focused squarely upon on the one true God, Christ Jesus.
I’m pleased to see someone knows how to use a thesaurus. Why say “reject” when you can use “repudiate” instead? Atheists reject all religions and all gods. We say they are unnecessary for living a moral and ethical life and to prove it we live moral and ethical lives without crediting deities for our good fortune or blaming demons for bad luck.
As an atheist, your apathy to not seek and find the absolute truth is a choice you make for yourself and you alone bear burden of on your own. For you to demand evidence from someone of God’s existence is showing just how much you do not want to know nor experience the evidence of God’s existence.
I could use Kirk here again, but I think I’ll just point out that if we’re demanding evidence, it’s because nobody has shown us verifiable evidence of experiences that can prove gods exist. All we get are miraculous marvels delivered by word of mouth, and video footage of clouds or trees or windows or water stains that are vaguely people shaped. Holy Pareidolia, Batman! They’re everywhere! Does this really mean God is everywhere, or is belief so strong in some people that they’ll jump to ridiculous conclusions rather than look for sensible explanations? I’m going out on a very sturdy limb here, and saying it’s the latter.
Again, this is a choice you make to want to honestly know God or not and not my or anyone else’s responsibility to take for you.
And for that, whatever that means, I’m grateful. (I’m also grateful to Live Granades for loving Star Trek enough to LOL my most favourite episode! Thanks and big hearts to you!)
Posted by 1minionsopinion
Posted by 1minionsopinion
Posted by 1minionsopinion




