I’ve skimmed my way through most of this book by James R. Brayshaw, Satan Christianity’s Other God, enough to give a rundown at least. As an atheist, there’s nothing overly illuminating in it, aside from the historical aspects. As a lifelong Christian, which Brayshaw is (was?), it was eye-opening to study the bible as much as he did and come to these conclusions.
Volume 1 is nearly five-hundred pages of history and verses and proofs illustrating how Satan evolved as a concept in the Old Testament. The earliest writings in there refer to an adversary, which was what the word sawtawn meant. It didn’t mean a specific person or being. On page 100, Brayshaw lists all the places where a word referring to goats was used – sa’iyr – and how many different translations of that word wound up in the Torah. Some verses translated it into kid, some into goat, some into devils and demons. The original point was, don’t worship goats, worship Yahweh. Don’t make your sacrifices at pagan alters, make them for Yahweh. Don’t invent and worship those wilderness gods with lots of hair and cloven hooves, worship Yahweh who really truly exists…
The earliest writings credit Yahweh with the making of all things, good and evil. He’s a god. If there’s evil in the world, it’s because he wants it. Brayshaw points out that later writings, after the Israelites wandered for a while and met the Persians, they got the idea of dualism, which helped them learn to attribute evil to an evil influence in the world.
Brayshaw thinks it’s worth pointing out that the writers (Moses and Yeshua get mentions) were heavily influenced by the mythologies and religions of the places they were living, especially in Egypt. Their writing reflects where they were and ideas of the time they were there. A lot of it is metaphorical and some of it is misunderstanding — not theirs necessarily, but the fault of later readers and writers who altered and manipulated the original text while trying to bring it to the masses.
Brayshaw includes a link to the Satan entry at Monstropedia which elaborates on how Adversary became Satan. Satan became a character in the book later as a misinterpretation, a misrepresentation of snakes and deceivers and adversaries and other enemies of a people, not of a god.
He spends a lot of the book pulling apart the areas of the bible where Satan supposedly influenced the story. The events surrounding the trial of Job were all set rolling by God who sent an enemy to Job to test his faith. Lucifer is a Latin translation of the Hebrew word for “morning star” could have referred to a human king on his way out, possibly a King of Babylon who fell from grace. Zechariah, Ezekiel and the serpent in the garden each get a section devoted to correcting the flawed assumptions of an evil being’s influence.
Bottom line, there never was a Satan. People think there is, but they’re wrong.





January 14, 2009 at 6:58 am
Notice Ezekiel 28:14-15: “Thou [Lucifer] art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I [God] have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created ….” Two things to notice: Lucifer was created by God, and he was created perfect. Lucifer had great knowledge, understanding and wisdom. He was the greatest being God could create by fiat. The rest of verse 15 continues, “till iniquity [or lawlessness] was found in thee.” So this great being—the greatest being God could possibly create by fiat—who was taught at the very throne of God, sinned and rebelled against God. How could that have happened? God certainly didn’t create an evil devil. He created a perfect, beautiful archangel—Lucifer.
Isaiah asked the same question. “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!” (Isaiah 14:12). God revealed the answer in the next two verses: “For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High” (verses 13-14). Lucifer allowed his beauty to fill him with vanity. It wasn’t enough that God had placed him on the throne of this Earth to administer the government of God. He looked on what God had with envy—for God ruled the entire universe. Lucifer thought he could eventually ascend up into the heavens and forcefully remove God from His throne! And so we see how Lucifer acquired this evil, sinful nature. He acquired it through false reasoning, which led to rebellion. He falsely reasoned that he was just as good, if not better, than the God who created him.
Ezekiel 28:17 says, “Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness ….” This perfect, beautiful being, who was full of great wisdom and knowledge, became corrupted because of false reasoning. He allowed the wisdom and knowledge God had given him to fill him with vanity. He then worked to deceive those angels he ruled over on this Earth. He led one third of the angels into rebellion against God and His laws (2 Peter 2:4; Revelation 12:4).
January 14, 2009 at 10:28 am
What’s all that about?
January 14, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Satan does exist…. says the Holy Bible…..
January 15, 2009 at 7:27 am
But only because later tribes added the idea into it. He wasn’t a character in the earliest writings. He didn’t exist prior to his complete and total invention. That’s what Brayshaw was getting at. He’s entirely invented as an adversary to explain why god lets evil stick around. Earliest writing has god responsible for both good and evil.
November 16, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Mahalia,
Doubt this wil ever get read by him, but dude, you so missed the point. Both Eziekiel 28 and Isiah 14 are about men. Isiah 14:16 “Who is this MAN” That’s a refernce to the morning star., and all the verse you quotd, and it’s about a MAN, we know because it says so. Not a fallen angel. If you rad this book, or ever studied anyone’s point of view bweside your own, you’d know Ezikiel 298 is about another mAN (becasue it plainly says so) and that the Revelation quote is as well. Let go of the precepts of man.
November 17, 2009 at 2:53 pm
The book so open for interpretation it’s a wonder anyone can agree on parts of it well enough to set a congregation going.